Austin / Central Texas Real Estate News & Updates

Keep up to date with the latest Central Texas real estate trends and news.

Thursday, November 7, 2013

The Incredible Shrinking Dollar in Austin


Affordability — especially when it comes to homes — has become a Texas-sized issue in Austin

East Austin Home
 (photo credit: Nick Simonite)
Austin can't afford this home. At least the average Austinite can’t. This three-bedroom, 826-square-foot home about 10 minutes east of downtown is priced at about $240,000 — between the median and average price. The problem: If you have a median salary you can’t qualify for a mortgage even close to that amount. A 20-percent down payment wouldn’t just be encouraged, it would be the absolute least you could do to appease lenders.




Think of Austin’s booming residential real estate situation like one of those head-scratching problems from middle school algebra.  If Austin grows by 137 people every day and only builds housing to accommodate half of those newcomers, and if Austin residents continue to see their income growth lag behind other major cities, how long will it be before most residents are priced out of the local market?

Exact figures fluctuate by a few percentage points from one study to the next, but by most measures, home prices in Austin have grown by about 10 percent annually since the real estate market recovered in 2011.That sort of increase isn’t record-breaking — the annual U.S. jump in home prices stands at about 12 percent — but Austin homes didn’t lose notable value during the recession, so while other cities are getting back to pre-recession levels, Austin is trudging higher.

The median single-family home price in Austin stands between $235,000 and $240,000, up 13 percent from a year ago and a 40 percent increase in value since 2008. Over that same five-year span, incomes in the Austin area have only grown by 15 percent, according to the Bizjournals’ On Numbers Economic Index.

With the median annual income in the Austin area standing at about $55,000 — enough to qualify for a loan of just under $200,000 — and not keeping pace with housing prices, more Austinites are finding that latching onto the age-old American dream is increasingly out of reach.

“There’s that old saying and it’s still true, that you drive until you qualify,” said Charles Heimsath, president of Austin-based Capitol Market Research. “The reason price is escalating is because of the inability of developers to get new lots on the ground to build. Lenders are now tentatively getting back into the business of lot development.”

A recent study found that about 6,500 new lots had been added to the Austin market in 2013 as of Oct. 1. That’s a slight increase over the 6,000 that would be typical in a year, Heimsath said, suggesting housing supply could start to grow from its record tightness of only a 2.7 month supply available. A healthy home supply is about six months.

It’s bad — but not California bad
The good news, relatively speaking, is that the availability of land in the surrounding area means it would be almost impossible for Austin housing prices to resemble those of San Francisco, where earlier this year the median home price topped $1 million. Still, the growing gap between prices and area incomes is becoming a concern for real estate professionals and economists. According to real estate research firm Metrostudy, Austin is alone among Texas’ major cities in having home prices that outstrip loan eligibility.

The median home price in Dallas is $202,300 and the median income of $60,383 qualifies for a loan of $210,792. The median home price in Houston is $187,800 and the median income of $55,000 qualifies for a loan equal to that median price. Citing figures that 38,000 low-income households are unable to afford housing in the city, the Austin Board of Realtors threw its support behind the Nov. 5 affordable housing bond measure that passed.

That will yield about $65 million for affordable housing, but most expect it will act as little more than a speed bump to surging home prices in the market — especially since, in some cases, it will take years for new units to come onto the market. But if interest rates climb and stay above 4 percent as many expect, price increases could cool off to around 9 percent annually in the coming years.

Will work for food
Jonathan Boatwright, co-founder of Realty Austin, said many would-be buyers have to stay in apartments or rental homes while they wait and see if the market turns back in their favor. That means either housing supply starts to meaningfully catch up to demand, which no one sees happening soon, or job candidate demands “push employers to pay higher wages.”

That also isn’t likely, said Yoany Torres, a senior staffing consultant at L.K. Jordan & Associates who transferred to Austin from Houston this year and was struck by the willingness of Austin’s job candidates to work for wages lower than in her former market despite the higher cost of living.
Torres said there’s no fixed number on the disparity since incomes in different industries can fluctuate wildly, but she said hourly middle-class jobs in manufacturing and clerical work typically pay 25 percent less in Austin than in Houston. The main reason for that discount, she said, is that Austin has a large population of artists, musicians, designers and more who are willing to take a stable hourly job for less money as an alternative to the erratic incomes of their creative pursuits.

“(Candidates) here are more educated and lots who come in have degrees but aren’t demanding the pay you’d normally see with that, so they’re willing to work for $12 an hour,” Torres said.“I was surprised when I got here and started seeing the job orders and what employers wanted for qualifications compared to what they are willing to pay. But a lot of the candidates here are coming off of jobs waiting tables or they’re involved in things like theater and the arts, and they just wanted anything that was more stable. It’s a different culture.”

How it got this way
It took a while for Austin’s housing market to emerge from the 2008 housing crisis and recession, but when it did, sales went into overdrive almost overnight. And they’ve stayed there ever since.
Tom Thornton, a broker associate with Realty Austin, said he and other Realtors saw sales pick up “almost like someone flipped a switch” around Thanksgiving 2011, with buyers acting on years of pent-up demand thanks to low interest rates and prices that were lower than they should have been for a fast-growing city.

“Things were flat through most of 2011, and then in Q4 sales just went bonkers and they’ve been strong ever since,” he said. “Lots of people had been sitting on the fence and because of low interest rates and the improvement in the economy a lot of people who had been renting their properties started to sell.”

The extreme seller’s market that’s resulted ever since — coupled with a prolonged lag in new home construction and the addition of an estimated 137 new residents to the Austin area every day — has caused home prices to climb at a rate some think might not be sustainable, or at least healthy for the core city’s demographic makeup.

“I’ve never experienced this rapid of a price increase in Austin before,” Boatwright said. “The changes in income tax (rates) in California are causing a lot of people to move here from there, and building is just starting to pick back up. There’s lots of single-family on the outskirts, there’s thousands of apartments coming online but the condo developments are about 18 to 24 months away from delivering what’s needed.”

Staff Writer- Austin Business Journal


Labels: , , , , ,

Monday, January 28, 2013

Austin #1 - America's Fastest Growing Cities (Forbes)


If you haven't heard, Austin is getting bigger.... 

Texas State Capitol
Forbes rated the 100 largest MSAs based on Population Growth, 2012 Job Growth, Rate of Economic Growth (gross metro product growth). They also used federal Unemployment Data & Median Salary data.  They came up with their list of the 20 fastest growing metro areas in the US.  Texas leads the nation, again!  This is GOOD for Real Estate - but not so great for traffic.  ;}

"Perhaps not surprisingly, cities in Texas — which welcomed more than 427,000 newcomers from August 2011 to July 2012, according to the U.S. Census Bureau — dominated our list. Houston ranked second, behind Austin, followed by Dallas in third place and San Antonio in ninth. Robust labor markets, unemployment rates under 6% (well below the national average),no state income tax, a business-friendly regulatory environment, and strong population inflows all contributed to Texas towns’ high rankings."

1) Austin, TX

  • M.S.A.: Austin-Round Rock-San Marcos, TX
  • 2012 Population growth rate: 2.8%
  • 2013 Population growth rate: 2.7%
  • Job growth rate: 3.1%
  • Unemployment: 4.9%Gross Metro Product: 6.3%
  • Median salary: $63,200

2) Houston, TX

  • M.S.A.: Houston-Sugar Land-Baytown, TX
  • 2012 Population growth rate: 2%
  • 2013 Population growth rate: 2%
  • Job growth rate: 3.4%
  • Unemployment: 5.8%
  • Gross Metro Product: 6.8%
  • Median salary: $70,900

3) Dallas, TX

  • M.S.A.: Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX
  • 2012 Population growth rate: 2.1%
  • 2013 Population growth rate: 2.1%
  • Job growth rate: 2.1%
  • Unemployment:5.7%
  • Gross Metro Product: 5.9%
  • Median salary: $65,100

4) Raleigh, NC
5) Salt Lake City, UT
6) Seattle, WA
7) Provo, UT
8) Phoenix, AZ

9) San Antonio, TX

  • M.S.A.: San Antonio-New Braunfels, TX
  • 2012 Population growth rate: 2.1%
  • 2013 Population growth rate: 2%
  • Job growth rate: 2%
  • Unemployment: 5.6%
  • Gross Metro Product: 4.1%
  • Median salary: $56,900

10) Portland, OR
11) Washington, DC
12) San Jose, CA
13) San Diego, CA
14) San Francisco, CA
15) Boise, ID
16) Denver, CO
17) Oklahoma City, OK
18) Charlotte, NC
19) Bakersfield, CA
20) Ogden, UT


Full Text of Forbes.com Article

Labels: , , , , , , , , , ,

Thursday, January 17, 2013

Austin Ranked #2 in Cities w/ New & Sustained Job Growth

Best-Performing Cities 2012 
 - Where America's Jobs are Created & SustainedRoss DeVolArmen Bedroussian, and Yu (Lydia) Liu
January 17, 2013
http://bestcities.milkeninstitute.org/

"The Milken Institute's annual index of Best-Performing Cities indicates that tech is back, especially in the world's best-known hub of innovation. The United States' best-performing metro area is San Jose, the capital of Silicon Valley. Other cities with strong exposure to technological innovation scored high in the new ranking: Austin, Texas (No. 2, up from fourth place); Raleigh, N.C. (No. 3, up from No. 14); the Washington, D.C., metro (No. 5 from No. 17); and Cambridge, Mass. (No. 8 from No. 12).
San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, Calif., vaulted 50 spots from last year to No. 1, a position it last held on the index in 2001. San Jose's recovery has spread through the region's economy: For each job added in the tech sector, five jobs are created in other industries. For example, Apple has an estimated 34,000 employees in the metro area but is responsible for another 170,000 jobs in the region."


LARGE METRO CITIES:

1) San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA (2011 ranking: 51)
2) Austin-Round Rock-San Marcos, TX 2 (2011 ranking: 4)
3) Raleigh-Cary, NC 3 (2011 ranking: 14)
4) Houston-Sugar Land-Baytown, TX 4 (2011 ranking: 16)
5) Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV 5 (2011 ranking: 17)
6) Salt Lake City, UT 6 (2011 ranking: 6)
7) Provo-Orem, UT 7 (2011 ranking: 9)
8) Cambridge-Newton-Framingham, MA 8 (2011 ranking: 12)
9) Charleston-North Charleston-Summerville, SC 9 (2011 ranking: 11)
10) Fort Worth-Arlington, TX 10 (2011 ranking: 24)

"Unlike other "best places" rankings, it does not use quality-of-life metrics, such as commute times or housing costs. In the Institute's index, employment growth is weighted most heavily due to its critical importance to community vitality. Wage and salary growth measures the quality of jobs created and sustained."



Download the full report to see the best small and medium cites.
http://www.VioletCrownRealEstate.com/news/Best-Performing-Cities-Report-2012.pdf

Labels: , , ,

Tuesday, December 11, 2012

Angelou says he's 'Bullish' on Austin's Economy


Economist Angelos Angelou says he's 'bullish' on Austin's economy, citing fast population growth, a rise in job opportunities and continued worldwide exposure to the city's entertainment offerings.

"Corporations are looking for the best workforce, entrepreneurial environment and young people and we've got all those here in Austin," said Angelou. 

Angelou spoke to a crowd of hundreds at the AT&T Conference Center on the University of Texas Tuesday morning. This is the 27Th year Angelou has given a forecast.

Angelou predicts 130,000 people will move to Austin over the next two years, putting additional demand on the area's real estate market. He forecasts double digit housing growth in the Austin area for the next three to four years, and he believes housing prices will increase.

He also predicts retail sales will grow by eight percent in the next two years and bring an additional 3,500 new jobs. Angelou says leisure, hospitality, education, health and tech industries will continue to grow.

Angelou forecasts that Austin will lead Texas in the biomedical field thanks to the newly approved UT medical school and teaching hospital. He said a $225 million dollar new VA hospital will also add to the growth in that field.

"Austin is the entrepreneurial center of Texas, and there will be a lot more ideas and new start-ups in the biotechnology sector in the years to come," said Angelou.

(From an article on KVUE.com)

Labels: , ,

Monday, October 8, 2012

Austin Ranks No. 2 on New Economic Index Ranking

360 Bridge in Austin, Texas

Austin ranks No. 2 out of the country’s 102 largest cities on a new economic index ranking.


According to the October 2012 version of the On Numbers Economic Index released Monday, Austin is ranked 2nd on the list behind Oklahoma City.
The index measures the relative economic vitality of all 102 U.S. metropolitan areas that have more than 500,000 residents. It is updated on the second Monday of each month.
The index is generated by an 18-part formula that assesses private-sector job growth, unemployment, earnings, housing-price appreciation, and construction and retail activity.  (See details below for information on how these numbers are determined.)
Here’s the listing for the top 20 cities. Texas Cities are in Bold.

Oklahoma City
91.14
Austin
86.69
Tulsa
80.50
Houston
77.08
Omaha
76.66
Denver
76.59
Columbus
74.68
Boston
74.48
Pittsburgh
74.28
San Antonio
73.34
Little Rock, Ark.
70.22
Durham, N.C.
69.09
Cincinnati
68.76
Dallas-Fort Worth
68.25
Louisville
68.17
Charleston, S.C.
68.10
Ogden, Utah
67.95
San Jose
66.14
Salt Lake City
63.72
Portland, Maine
63.27

__________________________
The On Numbers Economic Index is calculated once a month, based on the latest official statistics for all U.S. metropolitan areas with estimated populations above 500,000. The index is designed to show the relative economic strength of those 102 major metros.

SOURCES

All raw data come from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Federal Housing Finance Agency, and are the latest available figures as of the second Monday of the current month.

TYPES OF CALCULATIONS

The formula for the On Numbers Economic Index has 18 components. They fall into four general categories:
• Five-year changes are calculated between the latest available data and the corresponding data for the same month (or quarter) five years ago.
• One-year changes are calculated between the latest available data and the corresponding data for the same month (or quarter) one year ago.
• Long-term trends are calculated over five one-year intervals: between the same month (or quarter) five years ago and four years ago, between the same month four years ago and three years ago, between the same month three years ago and two years ago, between the same month two years ago and one year ago, and between the same month one year ago and now. Those five percentages are then combined into a single score.
• Current rates are the latest rates available.

FORMULA COMPONENTS: These are the 18 components of the formula for the Index:
1.       Five-year change in private-sector employment.
2.       One-year change in private-sector employment.
3.       Long-term trend in private-sector employment.
4.       Five-year change in unemployment rates.
5.       Current unemployment rate.
6.       Long-term trend in unemployment rates.
7.       Five-year change in weekly earnings per private-sector worker.
8.       One-year change in weekly earnings per private-sector worker.
9.       Long-term trend in weekly earnings per private-sector worker.
10.   Five-year change in construction-sector employment.
11.   One-year change in construction-sector employment.
12.   Long-term trend in construction-sector employment.
13.   Five-year change in retail-sector employment.
14.   One-year change in retail-sector employment.
15.   Long-term trend in retail-sector employment.
16.   Five-year change in house values. (House values are updated quarterly. All other factors are updated monthly.)
17.   One-year change in house values.
18.   Long-term trend in house values.



Labels: , , , ,

Wednesday, February 29, 2012

Austin is 8th among the nation's 100 biggest metros for Economic Security

Austin is 8th among the nation's 100 biggest metros for Economic Security afforded families.

Click to view Interactive Map
The MetroTrends team has graded the nation’s 100 biggest metros on how much economic security they offer families in these tough times. The rankings reflect erosion in house values, current unemployment, purchasing power of a low-wage job, and the rate of serious mortgage delinquencies. The best? Oklahoma City. The worst? Las Vegas.

Austin-Round Rock-San Marcos
Overall: A | 8th
Home Price Erosion: A | -7.8%
Unemployment: B | 7.5%
Housing Unaffordability: D | 1.64
Inc. Needed for 2-BR Apt: $38,160
Inc. from Low-Skill Job: $23,260
Serious Mort. Delinq.: A | 3.9%

Are you a super data geek?  You can download the full Excel Spreadsheet from my website:
http://www.VioletCrownRealEstate.com/docs/Top100Rank.xls

By Urban Institute

Labels: , ,

Friday, January 7, 2011

Austin Ranked 3rd Best Job Market in US - Forbes.com

On the eve of a Katie Couric interview on Austin's job market, the city was ranked as having the third best employment prospects in the U.S.

Forbes.com released a report Thursday ranking Austin 3rd best job market in the U.S
. The business publication cited the city's low unemployment, about 7.1 percent, and low job-seekers per opening ratio, about 2.39 to one.

Forbes said Austin has many assets that have helped it weather the downturn: It's a state capital and major convention center, especially for the music industry, and home to the University of Texas and a wealth of technology companies.

In October, Austin officials announced a new Eco-Merge Green Corporate Center devoted to producing new technologies, Forbes said. Also, several international firms, including Toshiba and China's Taiwan Clean Energy, plan to open shop here.

The listing is not Austin's first appearance on Forbes' best of lists. The publication ranked Austin No. 1 last year for economic recovery, 8th best for business and careers, No. 2 most innovative and 10th best place for best cities for young professionals, among other rankings.

Washington, D.C. topped the most recent list as healthiest labor market among major U.S. metro areas. By one estimate, the nation's capital has roughly one advertised job opening for every unemployed worker in the region. Its unemployment is just 6 percent, the lowest among the country's largest 50 metros.

Las Vegas was ranked as having the worst major job market with 14.3 percent unemployment and eight unemployed workers for every job opportunity.

The see the full listing, click here.

Austin Business Journal
1/7/2011

Labels: , ,

Tuesday, January 26, 2010

Austin Ranks #2 in Best Performing Cities for Job Growth & Employment



How did Austin rank in job growth compared to the other top 50 U.S. Metros? We were Number Two in the nation!

When you compare to jobs lost in the U.S. in 2009 (4,941,700) or TEXAS (201,700), Austin’s performance is amazingly strong. With so many indications of growth returning to different segments of the economy, Austin is well positioned to benefit early on in the recovery.

The Austin Chamber of Commerce’s customary ranking of the best performing large metros, we retain second place behind Virginia Beach.
#2 Austin’s aggregate job losses of 2,300 (-0.3%) as compared to #1 Virginia Beach job losses of 1,600 (-0.2%).
Fort Worth was 8,000 (-0.9%)
San Antonio was 9,000 (-1.1%)
Dallas was 42,100 (-2.0%)
Houston was 92,500 (-3.5%)

Top 10 Best Performing Cities
1) Virginia Beach
2) Austin
3) Washington DC
4) Newark
5) Fort Worth
6) San Antonio
7) Edison
8) Columbus
9) Baltimore
10) Boston

Source: Austin Chamber of Commerce

Labels: , , , ,

Wednesday, November 11, 2009

Austin Area Tops City Performance Index

The Austin-Round Rock area was named the best performing city on the 2009 Milken Institute/Greenstreet Real Estate Partners Best Performing Cities Index.

Killeen-Fort Hood-Temple, McAllen-Edinburg-Mission and Houston-Sugar Land-Baytown were second, fourth and fifth, respectively. Also, Houston-Sugar Land-Baytown was named one of the top five largest cities, and Midland was named the No. 1 small metro.

The index ranks U.S. metro areas based on their ability to create and sustain jobs, measuring employment, salary growth and technology output.

“Texas’ strong position in our best performing cities study demonstrates that a favorable business climate, combined with a low-cost/low-tax environment, is highly supportive of job creation,” said Ross DeVol, senior economist at the Milken Institute and lead author of the report. “The state has diversified its economy by fostering several key high-tech clusters, and the passage of Proposition 4, allocating $500 million in funding for research universities, will make Texas an even more formidable competitor in the future.”

Labels: , , ,

Tuesday, October 13, 2009

Austin a Top Place to Launch a Small Business

With so many Americans in the unemployment line these days, a growing number are looking at entrepreneurship as an option. That's what makes this year's list of the best cities to start a small business from Fortune all the more timely.

The folks at Fortune rank Austin eighth on this year's list, behind cities such as Houston, Raleigh, N.C. and No. 1 Oklahoma City. Austin got kudos for its angel investment groups, business-friendly tax structure and support for business development in sectors like tech.

"The Austin metro area, which has doubled its population growth in the last 20 years, is often used as a test market by national companies because its large minority population reflects the nation's future demographic mix," Fortune said. "With University of Texas college students in residence, the area offers entrepreneurial opportunities for the youth market and skilled workers for local businesses. One-third of the area's payroll is related to technology jobs, contributing to Austin's reputation for having one of the most educated workforces in the nation."

But it isn't all roses for Austin. Fortune cited some complaints from business owners such as transportation issues and lack of flights to desired markets.

Fortune's top 10 cities:

1)Oklahoma City, OK
2)Pittsburgh, Penn.
3)Raleigh, NC
4)Houston
5)Hartford, Conn.
6)Washington D.C.
7)Carlotte, NC
8)Austin
9)New York City
10)Baltimore, MD

Source: Austin Business Journal

Labels: , , ,

Tuesday, September 22, 2009

Austin Among Best Performing U.S. Metros (Economic Recovery)

Austin and San Antonio will be the first two U.S. cities to recover from the recession, according to a new national forecast from IHS Global Insight.

The forecast from the Lexington, Mass. economic research firm suggests the two Texas cities will bounce back to their pre-recession job levels sometime next year.
Eight other metropolitan areas are predicted to recover by 2011, a group that includes Texas’ two largest markets, Dallas-Fort Worth and Houston, along with Washington, D.C.

IHS Global Insight said most metros will start adding employment next year, but the increases are likely to be tepid. “Solid gains will not return for the majority of the country until 2011,” the report said.

Austin is also named one of the 20 best performing metropolitan areas in the second quarter of 2009, according to a study by the Brookings Institution. The second quarter MetroMonitor report tracked nine metrics in 100 U.S. metro areas, and found Austin was a leader in many of those, from percent change in gross metropolitan product to percent change in housing prices.

Employment in Austin fell 0.5 percent from its pre-recession peak, that was the second-narrowest gap in the nation. The Texas Capital was also one of only three metro areas that surpassed their pre-recession peak output by the second quarter of 2009. Along with the other two cities, McAllen and Washington D.C., Austin was one of those least affected by the downturn.

The report’s authors said the figures reveal some stark differences in economic performance among metro areas. “Signs at the national level that job and income losses are slowing continue to mask the highly variable performance of individual metropolitan economies,” said Alan Berube, co-author of the report. “While several metro areas may have reached a turning point, there are many others that still have not touched bottom, as well as a few that have almost fully recovered.”
Texas had the strongest showing, with six cities among the 20 strongest metro areas: Austin, Dallas, El Paso, Houston, McAllen and San Antonio. Florida dominated the list of the 20 weakest metro areas with eight, including Bradenton, Cape Coral, Lakeland, Miami, Orlando, Palm Bay and Tampa.
For the full report, click here.

Source: Austin Business Journal

Labels: , , ,

Thursday, July 23, 2009

Austin Poised for Fastest Recovery

From now until the end of 2010, the Austin economy is projected to grow by $5 billion. That, coupled with relatively subdued unemployment, has the Texas Capital poised for the quickest economic rebound in the nation, according to Forbes.com.


Overall, many economists expect the national economy to return to growth later in 2009, perhaps as soon as this summer. But, as the Forbes writers point out, that won't be the case everywhere. While some cities are positioned for a quick rebound, others face a slow crawl to recovery that could take years.


Texas cities such as Austin, San Antonio, Dallas and McAllen are in a good position, Forbes' analysis found. That's due in part to the fact that Texas did not see the massive real estate bubble that formed in states like California, Nevada and Florida.


To determine the 10 cities that look best poised for recovery, Forbes examined estimates from data provider Moody's Economy.com of the projected gross domestic product of metropolitan areas across the U.S., as well as unemployment figures from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and home prices, incomes and affordability data from the National Association of Home Builders.
The analysis shows the importance of a city's economic make-up. In essence, the more diverse the industry base is in a particular city, the better off that city is when it comes to quick recovery.
The top five cities for recovery, in order, are Austin; Fayetteville, Ark.; Boulder, Colo.; Huntsville, Ala.; and San Antonio.

Source: Austin Biz Journal

Labels: , ,

Tuesday, December 2, 2008

Austin job creation slower, but still outpacing rivals


Employment in the Austin-Round Rock region increased 1.9 percent between October 2007 and October 2008, outpacing many of Austin’s economic development competitors, according to data released Tuesday by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.


The local region added about 14,700 jobs in the 12-month period, bringing its total employment figure to roughly 781,000, according to the report.

By comparison:
• San Jose, Calif. added 700 jobs for a 0.8 percent increase
• Raleigh, N.C. added 8,800 jobs for a 1.7 percent increase
• Nashville, Tenn. lost 2,200 jobs for a 0.3 percent decrease
• Seattle lost 1,900 jobs for a 0.1 percent decrease
• Phoenix lost nearly 50,000 jobs for a 2.3 percent decrease
• San Antonio added 17,900 jobs for a 2.9 percent increase
• Memphis, Tenn. lost 10,800 jobs for a 1.7 percent decrease
• Albany, NY remained stagnant.

Labels: , , , ,